Home > General rants > Clueless Republican….should go back in the closet!

Clueless Republican….should go back in the closet!

I had an article sent to me by a friend recently that was written by- what a shock- another dumb ass woman.

http://republicaninthearts.blogspot.com/2011/11/clueless-ron-paul-wants-to-befriend.html

Broken down, the article is about how Ron Paul is a moron. This would be all well and good [I am fine with people calling others idiots, either directly or indirectly] but only if it is warranted.

I swear we need to repeal women’s voting rights. They keep writing this crap and I keep debunking it. Women should just stop blogging about politics all together. Stick with what you know. Here are some helpful examples of things you can occupy your time with that are far more productive than your silly ass opinion about politics.

Or

First lets focus on the first thing this dolt…[though possibly hot since she is a republican, democrats are blah] has to say in her article.

“Thankfully, presidential-hopeful Ron Paul is in no way a viable candidate- straw polls be damned- because if this country wasn’t in trouble already, we’d take a further nose dive under his leadership.”

It’s always nice when morons post a second statement to back up a first statement that had nothing to do with with the first statement. Using very strange logic, Clueless Republican Woman or lets just say CRW for short, managed in one sentence to destroy her own argument.

She says Ron Paul isn’t viable…then points out the very straw polls that make him viable! Way to go dipshit! You have me sold. It certainly looks like the people of Illinois don’t think he is viable either.

Then CRW goes on to say that our country would go even further down the toilet on his watch than Barack Obama! I have to assume she means Barack Obama since he is the one in charge now, and Ron Paul would only come to power by ousting him in the next election.

Next retarded statement.

“Paul is a naive fool at best when it comes to foreign policy.”

Way to go on your research CRW. You really nailed this one! You are so right! Aside from sitting on the “House International Relations Committee” and writing a bestselling book on the subject, “Foreign Policy Of Freedom” as well as having actually been in the military [unlike every other candidate running] I would say the man is a totally naive fool when it comes to foreign policy.

Of course CRW, if you have a history of sitting on congressional committees that have to do with foreign policy or have put hundreds of hours of research into a foreign policy plan based on what our founding fathers practiced and put that knowledge into a book that thousands bought, I will shut up right now and concede that you are right. What’s that you say? You don’t? Oh, OK got it.

Based on your awesome foreign policy background, which I am sure rivals Ron Paul’s to be sure, I totally agree with your next comments since you are qualified to make them.

“His latest comments regarding Iran categorically prove that he is totally clueless, and would be a monumental disaster for the U.S.”

Here is the dictionary definition of categorically.

  “Being without exception or qualification; absolute.”

Boy I would say he is certainly “categorically” clueless also! Especially when you add what CRW has to say next to back up that claim!

“Most everyone in the world knows that Iran is in no way trustworthy, and that their nuclear ambitions are not as innocent as they would have us believe.”

Let me add to the list of countries that most people in the world don’t find very trustworthy, that also have access to nukes:

  1. United States
  2. China
  3. India
  4. Russia
  5. North Korea
  6. Pakistan
  7. Britain
  8. Israel

Now, can you honestly say that you trust any of the above countries with their nukes except the United States? I am still waiting for somebody to adequately give me guidelines on how we determine what countries are or are not allowed to have nuclear weapons. The United States has invaded Iraq and Afghanistan- two sovereign countries- without provocation to kill terrorists even though the terrorists that attacked us came from Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Lebanon, and The United Arab Emirates. If you didn’t see Iraq or Afghanistan on that list it’s because none of them were from either country.  Yet we are still allowed to keep nuclear weapons and there is no call in the international community to disarm us. Iran has only had one major conflict in the 20th century and it was…..AGAINST IRAQ! It was also defensive- they were attacked first. Now I don’t know about you, but history is telling me that I am not so sure our country has the moral authority to tell theirs what to do.

Now how does CRW support her war drums against Iran?

“In fact, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the U.N.’s  nuclear watchdog,  is set to publish a report claiming that the Iranians  worked diligently and secretly (thanks to Russians, North Koreans and Pakistanis!) on gathering all the information needed to build nuclear weapons.  Apparently they now have pretty much all they need, and with a mere 6 months to enrich uranium they would be good to go.”

First off, why in God’s name would a Republican listen to the U.N. about anything? Republicans are always [and rightly so] trying to cut U.N. funding from the United States for being scumbag motherfuckers run by dictators, fascists, and nation states. Yet I guess when the report supports what CRW wants, the U.N. is suddenly trustworthy and good.  Oh yes, with a packet of rainbow skittles and a smile the [IAEA] was able to uncover a sinister plot hatched by the Russians, Pakistanis, and North Koreans to give the Iranians all the information they need to know about making nuclear bombs [information that has been public for years]

http://news.softpedia.com/news/How-To-Make-An-Atomic-Bomb-53392.shtml

Yes, good Job [IAEA]! We wouldn’t want this sensitive information to get out!

Of course Ron Paul, who receives CIA briefings, says that Iran is years away from making a nuclear weapon. Of course, our government has a good track record of figuring out which country’s do or do not have WMD’s don’t we? Still I will take our CIA’s word over the [IAEA] any day not that I really trust either agency. Of course our awesome host CRW then goes on to almost contradict herself in the first sentence again!

“They are not saying that Iran has plans to do that, but the possibility of a nuclear Iran should strike fear in everyone.  But not Ron Paul.  No, Paul believes that the Iranian nuclear issue has been “blown out of proportion”, and seems to think that “offering friendship to them”  is a far better deterrent to their nuclear goals than sanctions.”

Ok, so the [IAEA] is not saying that Iranians are planning on enriching uranium to create nuclear bombs? So what proof do you have that they are going to? Oh that’s right- a gut feeling or something…they aren’t trustworthy right? I also now have information on how to build a nuke which I read on my above link….should my house be invaded until I give up my nuclear knowledge which will now have to be removed via ice cream scooper from my brain?

Also, offering friendship and open trade to a country usually is a great deterrent from war, as history has shown profit deters war…unless war is the profit. Then  sanctions will probably lead to war [as they have done in the past- just look at Iraq]

We also have another great deterrent to Iran ever using WMD’s against anybody- ever! You ready for this?

The IDF dumbass!

The Israelis have access to over 400 nuclear weapons and can deploy into Iran in a matter of hours for a full invasion. They have they finest air, land, and sea force in the entire region. Why does America need to be there shedding blood with them again? I don’t see the IDF in any of our wars helping out. Our best bet is to mind our fucking business and let the rest of the world blow itself up. How and why is this a bad plan? Then CRW goes on to say…

“At least that’s what he told Fox News Sunday.  Well, I have news for Mr. Paul. It won’t work. They have no desire to befriend “the great satan”.  They despise us and everything we stand for.”

Again, this is all based on your extensive foreign policy background, right? Or maybe you have been drinking the kool aid and not doing any of your own research. What makes you think Iranians despise us? Because of comments their unelected president (who is just a puppet to the real power in that country) says? I am sure they would hate us less if we hadn’t fucked up that country’s democracy by toppling their elected leader Mohammad Mosaddegh and giving his seat to a puppet authoritarian dictator! Then we demand endless sanctions against them because they want to protect themselves from aggressive neighbors like Iraq, whom they fought the longest war of twentieth century with, and weren’t the aggressors? Your inability to put yourself in somebody else’s shoes is absolutely amazing, lady! If I were Iranian, I would probably want nukes to!

She finishes with this.

Ron Paul isn’t going to change the Islamist mindset, and he’s a major fool to think he can.

Maybe you are a fool to think he can’t. History is full of great men who do just that! Change the course of public opinion globally. If the United States became the friend to all, enemy to none, more people than just the towel heads would change their opinions of us, that is for sure. Don’t think it is possible? Look at Sweden. They have declared neutrality in all conflicts since 1900….who are their enemies…NONE! I don’t like their gun laws and many of their socialist entitlement programs BUT…they got it right on foreign policy!

In closing…you are a dolt. You have potential though, just do a little research before opening your mouth and allowing too much woman feeling to overcome your logic!

  1. November 22, 2011 at 6:41 pm

    I am impressed with your kindness to dolts. Often, dolts are maligned and not taken seriously. It’s good to see someone take the time and effort to steer them toward the right path.

  2. Unrighteousfury
    November 22, 2011 at 8:08 pm

    Some dolt’s have potential. Also dolt’s are dangerous, as they can destroy my well informed vote. Usually I am a master of sarcasm….but here I can’t tell if you are being sarcastic or not. So that gives you Ken exactly one point on the unrighteousfury scoreboard with me nothing.

    I’ll get you next time gadget!

  3. November 22, 2011 at 8:36 pm

    Ha…! Unrighteousfury… you have a little *tingles* thing going for Ron Paul? [wink wink] Apparently so, since you are obviously a rabid misogynist. But that’s the least of it. I debated whether I should even bother with a neanderthol after reading your endless, pitifully long
    post dedicated to little ‘ol me. But I am always up for a challenge.

    First of all, yawn (long posts are a bore and a turn off).

    Second of all, I can’t go “back in the closet”, because I’m *still* there.

    And just a little reminder that in *this* country, we’re *all* (men AND women) entitled to our opinions, whether you agree with them or not. And with your Taliban-like attitude towards females maybe you should move to Afghanistan or, wait, how about Iran, since you think you we can be friends at this juncture in time. Maybe they’ll reserve a nice little space in Evin Prison for you.

    STRAW POLLS: Did not destroy my argument at all. Polls of any kind are majorly flawed. In 2008 Romney won straw polls, and let’s see… who won the nomination? Uh, Romney? Yep.
    Next: Ron Paul is NOT a viable candidate, and if he for some miraculous reason did win the Republican nomination (and he really is a Libertarian) because a bunch of idiots find him thrilling, he has no chance in hell of beating Obama. And we[‘d be doomed to another 4 years.

    “Then CRW goes on to say that our country would go even further down the toilet on his watch than Barack Obama! I have to assume she means Barack Obama since he is the one in charge now, and Ron Paul would only come to power by ousting him in the next election.”

    Huh?

    Ron Paul sits on the “House International Relations Committee” and wrote a bestselling book on the subject, “Foreign Policy Of Freedom”. So what? I have spent 1000s of hours researching the middle east for a now semi-defunct blog based out of India that I wrote for for many years. I know more than you do about the Muslim mentality.

    CATEGORICALLY: Huh? Your point? Should I simplify it for you: Ron Paul’s ” latest comments prove (without exception, absolutely) that he is clueless”. Do you not understand the meaning of categorically? I guess not.

    TRUSTWORTHY COUNTRIES: Of your list, the only one’s I don’t trust are Korea, because Kim Johg il is certifiably insane, and Pakistan because it’s a Muslim majority country. Do your research about Muslim supremacy and imperialism, dude, it dates back to before the Ottoman empire, and yes I have done a shitload of research on this. Have you? The difference between our enemies during the cold war and this war on terror is that Soviet soldiers weren’t willing to blow themselves up because of 72 promised virgins. As for Muslim imperialism- google the Third Caliphate.

    WAR DRUMS: Uh, can you point out where I mentioned ANYTHING at ALL about attacking Iran?? Hmm? Anywhere? My hope is that the Iranian people will manage to gain freedom on their own, but that seems unlikely as long as the Mullahs are in charge, and Ahmadinejad remains president. But unfortunately, this is what they wanted during their revolution in the late 1970s and what could be the destiny of Tunisia, Libya and Egypt, if they allow their Islamists to take control of their countries

    U.N.: You’re right, I have absolutely no respect for the U.N., so you think they are lying about Iran’s nuclear ambitions? I don’t tust them, but I trust Iran less. They lie. It’s called taqiya. Look it up. After all, Ahmadinejad says there are no homosexuals in Iran. Guess that means there aren’t. And why build a secret nuclear facility? If they were truly building nuclear facilities for energy, why thwart the IAEA at every turn? As for proof. Do you wait for them to become fully nuclear-capable?

    TRADE AND FRIENDSHIP: Maybe that would work with rational people who don’t believe that we are all infidels, and don’t believe in the return of the12th Imam- google that. And the Mullahs runnining the country are worse than Ahmadinejad.

  4. November 22, 2011 at 8:40 pm

    and you are the dolt to think that it is even remotely possible to deal with religious zealots who believe in Shariah law and the subjugation of women, but Oh.. that’s right, you feel the same way about women.

    You’re the one who needs to do your research buddy.

    Ron Paul will never win! Come back to me next year, and we’ll see who was right.

    • Tony
      November 22, 2011 at 9:23 pm

      Telling someone they are entitled to their own opinion is pretty redundant, considering the fact that even if said person is unable to voice their opinion, they still have their own opinion regardless. It’s called the ability to think! Secondly, you’re attacking someone about their opinions towards women yet you talk about a “Taliban” attitude in the middle east. Taliban isn’t even a country, and the specific country in which they reside, oh wait that doesn’t exist, since they are RELIGIOUS extremists makes you yourself a hypocrite. He think all women are useless, you think all Muslims are Taliban, you have more in common than you realize. Yea that attitude towards women is practiced in more countries around the world than isn’t.

      You also have to remember that “Taliban” attitude was actually a part of the United States way of thinking until, cough, MEN GAVE WOMEN RIGHTS!. So are you now calling the United States former members of the Taliban? I can be ridiculous as well.

      Also, it’s Neanderthal, not neanderthol.

      I’m not on either side, just saying, complaining at someone about their opinion, trying to say how your opinion is right, and then getting angry when you are making the same sorts of assumptions makes you just look like an ass.

      • November 23, 2011 at 4:54 am

        “Taliban isn’t even a country, and the specific country in which they reside, oh wait that doesn’t exist, since they are RELIGIOUS extremists makes you yourself a hypocrite”

        huh? the specific country in which they reside, oh wait that doesn’t exist? what the heck are you rambling on about?

        Who said Taliban was a country? I certainly didn’t. And your comment makes no sense whatseover, so I won’t even bother responding further. Other than to say you shouldn’t cast aspersions re. spelling since both you and UF both have spelling errors. Good lord, another Ron Paul-bot.

  5. Unrighteousfury
    November 22, 2011 at 10:18 pm

    Holy shit a woman with a spine! It’s too bad though, that you are a moron. I had such high hopes for you. Luckily I am here to once again point out how flawed your womanly logic is. Oh shit….was that an oxymoron?

    1. Oops, I wrote a long post. Unrighteousfury takes seriously all women who do not have the attention span to read through a well thought out out post. I understand the female limitation attributed to reading and understanding what they have read. So I will apologize to you, CRW, for forcing you with a gun to your head to read the entire uninteresting thing and comment on it.

    2. If you are still in the closet then why are you commenting publicly about your republican ideas? That doesn’t sound like you are in the closet at all. Unless you doing it anonymously for some reason…like being a coward. My name is Andrew Wilson. See how easy it is not to be a coward?

    Also, nice gay reference with the wink wink Ron Paul thing. I always enjoy it when a woman calls a man gay or implies it because he disagrees with you. The gay reference coming from somebody whose headline includes being in the closet, to me, is quite funny.

    Now, on to the meat of your stupidity,

    You say: “And just a little reminder that in *this* country, we’re *all* (men AND women) entitled to our opinions, whether you agree with them or not. And with your Taliban-like attitude towards females maybe you should move to Afghanistan or, wait, how about Iran, since you think you we can be friends at this juncture in time. Maybe they’ll reserve a nice little space in Evin Prison for you.”

    WOW! I wish I could come up with insults like this on the fly like you, CRW. They are brilliantly crafted and quite ingenious. Women are indeed entitled to their retarded opinions. However, our founders didn’t seem to think they were smart enough to vote and cancel out my man vote, which is infinitely more valuable than yours. I guess they also had a “Taliban like attitude toward women” didn’t they dipshit?

    I am sorry you didn’t understand the Barrack Obama reference. Don’t worry, take your time. I won’t take this post down for quite some time yet so you can read it over and over until you do.

    On the issue of straw polls, what is your point? It didn’t make Romney any less viable when he won the straw polls because he didn’t later win the nomination. Apples and oranges, lady. Also, if you think polls are majorly flawed why use them to support or not support your argument at all? Make some sense WOMAN!

    You then go on to say,

    So what? I have spent 1000s of hours researching the middle east for a now semi-defunct blog based out of India that I wrote for for many years. I know more than you do about the Muslim mentality.

    What was the blog called? I want proof! Also why do you assume for some reason I have not researched the subject? Is it because my analysis is different from yours and therefore [yes mostly because I am a man] right?

    Now let me give you a quick history lesson [again] try to keep up.

    You say: “TRUSTWORTHY COUNTRIES: Of your list, the only ones I don’t trust are Korea, because Kim Johg il is certifiably insane, and Pakistan because it’s a Muslim majority country. Do your research about Muslim supremacy and imperialism, dude, it dates back to before the Ottoman empire, and yes I have done a shitload of research on this. Have you? The difference between our enemies during the cold war and this war on terror is that Soviet soldiers weren’t willing to blow themselves up because of 72 promised virgins. As for Muslim imperialism- google the Third Caliphate.”

    You seem to be making some sort of strange argument that “Muslim Supremacy and imperialism” are good reasons not to trust them with nukes. It is true that Muslim countries have a deep past full of imperialism and supremacy. So does every other country on the list, you fucking twit! We won our very war of Independence against one such empire, and through free trade managed to make them our staunchest ally. Don’t pick and choose history lady. No western style cultured country has been invaded by a Muslim country since the Persians tried to conquer Greece. They dominate their own which affects us here NOT AT ALL! That is the entire point Ron Paul makes. Mind our own business and profit. You still have not addressed why that is bad foreign policy except to say that if Iran gets a Nuke “Maybe” something bad might happen to somebody somewhere. The Iranians have no ability whatsoever to invade the United States. They have not declared war on the United States. They have not attacked the United States. So again I ask- What is our justification to tell them they can’t have a nuke?

    Then you say: “WAR DRUMS: Uh, can you point out where I mentioned ANYTHING at ALL about attacking Iran?? Hmm? Anywhere? My hope is that the Iranian people will manage to gain freedom on their own, but that seems unlikely as long as the Mullahs are in charge, and Ahmadinejad remains president. But unfortunately, this is what they wanted during their revolution in the late 1970s and what could be the destiny of Tunisia, Libya and Egypt, if they allow their Islamists to take control of their countries.”

    The very reason the Mullahs are in charge is because of U.S interference which I see you did not address again. That is the price of meddling in affairs that are not our own. Also, if you think sanctions are not war drums you are fucking crazy! Or would you consider sanctions against the United States to be peaceful and something we would do nothing about if they were imposed on us? Just try woman, to see the shoe on the other foot for five minutes. It would be the same as if I went up to your husband and said “Hey man your wife is a moron!” then got punched in the face. Cause and affect, lady.

    You end with: “U.N.: You’re right, I have absolutely no respect for the U.N., so you think they are lying about Iran’s nuclear ambitions? I don’t tust them, but I trust Iran less. They lie. It’s called taqiya. Look it up. After all, Ahmadinejad says there are no homosexuals in Iran. Guess that means there aren’t. And why build a secret nuclear facility? If they were truly building nuclear facilities for energy, why thwart the IAEA at every turn? As for proof. Do you wait for them to become fully nuclear-capable?
    TRADE AND FRIENDSHIP: Maybe that would work with rational people who don’t believe that we are all infidels, and don’t believe in the return of the12th Imam- google that. And the Mullahs runnining the country are worse than Ahmadinejad.”

    Since Iran is a standing member of the U.N that should mean that you trust both the U.N and Iran equally…not at all. Again, the report didn’t say Iran was imminently going to strike anybody. Why are we allowed to impose these sanctions again? What has Iran done to incur our wrath besides being Muslims? Tell me one act of war Iran has committed against the United States Just ONE! Or show me one that deserves my gold going towards policing sanctions against a country Israel can easily defeat.

    Sorry, sister. Ron Paul got it right on this one, whether you think I am gay for thinking so or not.

    Oh, and before you accuse me of being some towel head lover maybe you should read some of my other blogs which mention Allah being a sissy. I am glad you want me to move over to Iran because you don’t agree with me, that seems to be a much more “Taliban like” view than my views on women.

    • November 23, 2011 at 12:39 am

      See what happens when you placate dolts? I admire your perseverance, but fear it is misplaced.

      This particular dolt is obviously a radical Muslim plant.

      …probably a rutabaga.

      • Unrighteousfury
        November 23, 2011 at 1:58 am

        Gotta try.

    • November 23, 2011 at 5:17 am

      Good Lord, you are tedious.
      1.You challenged me on my blog, did you not, to read your post? So I did. Is that so hard for you to comprehend? I guess it is for your little Ron Paul-sodden pea-brain.

      2. I am ‘in the closet’ because I am an actress, and people in my business are as asinine as you. I blog anonymously (hence in the closet) because I don’t want to be blackballed. It happens. and yeah, I am a coward (one thing we agree upon) because I want to continue to work.

      3. Actually, did I actually call you gay? The reference was to Chris Matthew who said Obama gave him a thrill. But, your hatred and disrespect for women could be an indication of some latent tendencies.

      4. Taliban/Founding fathers. You just proved MY point. This is the 21st century, dude, women have come a long way since then. I personally don’t want to step back to the dark ages of the Taliban or the days of our founding fathers when women were expected to remain barefoot and pregnant. Your comments just proved what kind of chauvinist you are.

      As for the Barack Obama reference. I assume you have no clue, hence your inability to explain. And I certainly won’t be bothered to read your post again.

      “Also, if you think polls are majorly flawed why use them to support or not support your argument at all? Make some sense WOMAN!” What??? You make some sense!

      FYI The blog was instablogs.com It’s actually listed on my blog as one of my other blogs.

      You know, I just don’t have any more time to waste on you, so have a nice life. Ron Paul will never win. Live with it.

      • Unrighteousfury
        November 23, 2011 at 6:32 am

        Yes yes, all well and good. Now can you tell me please what Iran has done to the united States to warrant sanctions or war? Please? That’s what the entire blog was about and you still have not answered it. I don’t like ragheads any more than you do. That doesn’t mean I want to blow them off the face of the earth until they do something that warrants it. Now PLEASE tell me what they have done that would convince anybody it would be a good idea to sanction their country which is an act of war, and WILL lead to war? Just one thing. I don’t want to hear about how they are bad people. We already know this. What have they done specifically to the United States that gives us sufficient reason to sanction or go to war with them?

        Also why do you keep trying to prove I am a chauvinist? I am not hiding from that label, indeed I take great pride in it. I don’t know why you think it is a dirty word. It is no worse than feminist I think.

        Might as well waste your time here. In the arena of ideas people like me are not going away. The old republican guard is dying out lady. Get with the times. Your generation has fucking destroyed our country. It is bad ass men such as myself who will bring it back to glory! Now answer the question!

      • September 25, 2013 at 1:02 am

        I am glad you enjoy my blog posts. You can read more on my website I hope that you will take the time to study my sight and beenfit from it. Always, Ron Baca

      • October 4, 2013 at 9:40 am

        Its a simple answer. Name 1 conservative republican, Pres Reagan was a conservative, so was Jessie Helms, but name 1 today that is. Not one that says they are a conservative. Definitely not one that the media says is a conservative, to the media anyone that’s a republican is a conservative. But one that really is a conservative, I can not think of any, at least there are no conservatives republicans in either the House, Senate, nor any of the Governors. That is why, although I am very conservative, I am not a republican, because the republicans are liberal, just not as liberal as the democrats.

      • October 18, 2013 at 11:20 pm

        Christy Incinelli – LOVE!!! Kristian, the Lord has blessed you with such an anizamg talent. You captured their personalities so perfectly. Can’t wait to see the rest. Thank you so much!!!May 1, 2012 2:03 PM

  6. anonymous ninja
    November 22, 2011 at 11:55 pm

    I am a chick, and sadly, UF is correct about most chicks being irrational, emotional, and illogical. He proves it by provoking knee-jerk rage by all women who read his comments and immediately respond with “NUH-UH! You’re gay!” Ever try talking to women? Especially about anything substantive? They don’t make it easy! Politics, science, finance, and humor are all subjects that usually leave most chicks with that deer in the headlights look, or an “I don’t care about that stuff” attitude. But ask the typical 20-something girl about the Kardashians, Coach purses, scrapbooking, or nightclubbing and you will get an enthusiastic “O-M-G! I looooove *insert above subject here*” Can’t say I blame the guy for being less than convinced that women today are worth paying attention to for the most part…. And I think Ron Paul kicks ass. Non-Interventionism does not equal Isolationism, and the policy of the last decade has been a miserable failure on all counts. Do a cost/benefit analysis instead of appealing to emotions and ideals.

  7. Anonymous
    November 26, 2011 at 7:22 pm

    I just want to say to incognito, you say that you stay in the closet because you are an actress and don’t want to be blackballed. This is bothersome, you want to sit in your quite little room posting opinions yet don’t have the guts to stand up to your co-workers. They’re are many actors who are very vocal about they’re political views and it hasn’t stalled they’re careers. It’s sad that you are to scared to name yourself amount them. In my opinion any person who has such strong feelings about anything should have the courage to stand up for them, especially if they’re going to post them all over the internet, not hide in a corner and secretly post on blogs. Be an American and stand up for what you believe is right. Fight the people that try to oust you. As a small business owner I am constantly fought for being a Christian and running my business as a Christian. I won’t lie or cheat people and it has cost me millions over the years, but I stand up as an American for my beliefs I don’t cheat and hide in a corner while people force me to be what they want. Grow up! You want people to listen to you then share who you are because it’s pretty hard to take anyone serious when they’re hiding in a dark corner… I applaud you Andrew for not being a little pussy and stating your name out right as an American!!!!

    P.S. I am also a woman…

  8. January 25, 2013 at 4:09 pm

    There are still a few North American conservatives with brinas left who haven’t adhered to the Eisenhower Republican Party (until ~1978 known as the Democratic Party). You kids have to go somewhere, and the Genghis Khan Was a Freaking Appeaser Party (known until ~1964 as the GOP) just doesn’t cut it.Ron Paul, not unlike Leon Trotsky before him, talks a mean game. I sympathize. You want to contribute to something less useless than those who spawned Scalia and Roberts, to say nothing of Thomas and Alito.Still, to pick up the Ron Paul banner is to forget that nativism (known until ~Newt Gingrich as racism) is no substitute for policy, not to mention thinking straight.Shorter comment: Ron Paul is a @#$%! wacko. I’d rather have another 8 years of George W. I make stroke victims seem coherent and rational’ Bush.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: